Archive for May, 2009

SB-2 Needed in Bow

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

From May 21, 2009
Goffstown News Editorial

So far this year, Town Meeting in Bow has lasted for four hours. During that time, three articles were discussed and voted on. And there still are 21 more articles to go.

This is a perfect example of why the town of Bow needs to adopt the official ballot law, or SB-2.

For many people, it is difficult to set aside even one evening to vote on items that will affect their tax bills. Now the town heads for round two on May 27 at 7:00 p.m..

The official ballot law would allow people to set aside a half hour during the day to vote on articles at their convenience in the privacy of a voting booth. Gone would be the days of two and three day meetings where fewer and fewer people show up for each.

When Town Meeting comes around next year, do yourself a favor and vote for SB-2.

Tom Keane Update 5/25/2009

Monday, May 25th, 2009

Dates:

Wednesday @ 7:00 PM @ the High School – Session #2 of this years town meeting will commence.

Thursday @ 5:30 PM Selectman’s Meeting will be held. Although I do not yet have the agenda I suspect the Police Dispatch problem will be a topic of discussion.

Town Meeting #2 remaining Warrant articles:

#7 – To raise in new taxes $350,000 for additional paving (standard repairs are included in the operating budget). If passed this will constitute about $90 in taxes on a $300,000 home.

#8 – To raise in new taxes $249,000 to be added to the capital improvement fund for Public Works. DPW has about $700,00 in the fund. The total fund has in excess of $3million in it. If passed this will constitute about $65 in taxes on a $300,000 home.

#9 – Raise and appropriate $170,000 to purchase an ambulance. Concord has 3 ambulances and receives approximately 10,000 calls per year. Bow has 1 ambulance (NEW in 2005) and receives about 1,000 calls per year. Historically Bow has used mutual aid when a second ambulance is needed.

If passed this would be the second new ambulance within four years.

#10 Spends $143,000 for a new DPW dump truck. NOTE: #8 ADDED $249,000 to this fund and now #10 spends $143,000 and a later article #18 spends another $35,000 of the $249,000. If the proposed warrants pass the net amount added to the capital reserve fund will only be $71,000. Not recommended by the budget committee 3-5

#11 – Raises another $66,000 to capital improvement fund for the “police equipment” capital reserve fund.

#12 – Establish a new category within the Capital Reserve Fund for bridge repair. New taxes totaling $60,000. A bridge capital reserve fund is necessary to receive state matching funds.

#13 – to raise and appropriate $49,000 for our annual town property reevaluation. This action moves money from one fund to another. The point of annual property evaluations is two fold. 1. Reflects the current housing market 2. Cost less then doing an evaluations every 5 years.

#14 – Raises another $48,500 to the capital reserve funds this time for Municipal Grounds and Building fund.

#15 – Raises another $42,000 to the capital reserve funds this time for Fire Department Equipment Capital reserve fund.

#16 – Raises another $42,000 to the capital reserve funds this time for Fire Department Truck fund which includes “pumper truck, ladder trucks, tanker trucks, forestry trucks, rescue trucks, and ambulances”. It is worth noting that the language includes “ladder trucks”. We currently do not have even one ladder truck let alone ladder trucks. Several of the other categories of trucks have mention of multiples when we currently only have one. This appears to be a sweeping change on what we will be saving money for future purchases.

#17 – Spend $40,000 from existing funds to purchase a new air compressor to fill the new self contained breathing tanks.

#18 – Spend $35,000 of the capital reserve fund for a new pickup truck for the DPW. This relates to articles #8 and #10.

#19 – Spend $27,000 of existing saving to upgrade the library computer system.

#20 – Spend $12,500 of existing saving to survey Alexander Cemetery.

#21 – Raises another $12,000 to the capital improvement fund this time for Parks & Recreatoin.

#22 – Raises $5,000 to fix the Community Building rest rooms.

#23 – Move $11,000 from an account originally set up to buy a vault protect the town’s historical documents to the general fund. The purchase of fireproof cabinets (not a vault) is covered in the operating budget.

#24 – This article is a new ordinance dealing with septic system design and replacement.

# 25 – CHANGE TOWN MEETING BACK TO THE MIDDLE OF WINTER

MY OPINION: I believe moving the date back to March will reduce voter participation. A couple of weeks ago the town experienced the third highest turnout in the last 30 years. This is proof that there is nothing wrong with the current May elections. Move town voting back to the dead of winter will actually suppress voter to turn out.

#26 – This is a vote to require elected officials to show the public the vote count (4 in favor 3 against) on the official town report and any other similar materials. A majority of the Budget Committee voted to NOT show the budget committee votes on School warrant articles. Voting yes on this issue will insure the general public knows how many members support or opposed a warrant article.

Tom Keane
8 Heidi Lane
715-1875

More on Abuse

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

As administrator of this website I strive to keep my opinions out of the fray while maintaining order. However, I have been getting a lot of inquiries as to what would cause anyone to be banned from posting here, after the banning of the user ‘publius’. The owners of this site strive to give voice to all opinions so it was not an easy decision. However, after ignoring what seemed to be a clear attempt at pretending to be for the ‘other side’ so he could discredit them, the decision to ban him was made only when that turned into what could only be called over-the-top spamming.

The situation is that this individual signed up with two usernames. In one persona ‘publius’, he expressed disagreement with SB2 and other tax issues that have support here. In another persona, ‘bowandarrow’ he acted as if he was on the side of the BCC with regard to supporting SB2 and other issues that are discussed here.

Over time it became apparent that the posts of ‘bowandarrow’ became increasingly over-the-top, sarcastic, and frankly, looking not to be serious but rather to make mockery of the BCC website.

Eventually the other users figured out that he was one and the same person when he accidentally posted using the wrong name… still in a thread on the blog. Other posts done in apparently the ‘wrong name’ never made it to the screen because they were spam.

Still signed in under the ‘wrong’ name (publius) but thinking he was signed in as ‘bowandarrow’ he attempted to disrupt with several posts; here is one copied verbatim:

“Pubby is a moron!!! Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!Pubby is a moron!!!”

It was at this point that ‘publius’ was banned.

During this time he claimed that his account was hacked. Upon investigating this, I found that it came from the exact same source, so it would have been impossible unless the hacker was sitting in the very same chair.

And now we come to the real ethical question that came from all of this; all this activity originated from the Franklin Pierce Law Center.

Posting from this location tells me he could be a janitor a the facility, or a law student, or perhaps worse, a practicing lawyer or law professor. If any of the latter is the case, then I have serious concerns about someone going into or already in the ‘law’ business who attempts to use such shady tactics to discredit honest people trying to get a fair vote for the people of Bow.

If this is the kind of tactic a lawyer or would-be lawyer thinks is acceptable, I would have huge reservations about the lawyers he was defending, the ones currently in place as your own town officials.