Town Update

August 16th, 2010

If you ever wondered how decisions are made in town you should attend this Tuesday’s Select Board meeting. If you plan to attend I would suggest you arrive between 6:00 PM and 6:30 PM.

Water and Sewer

The bids are in and the cost to build a traditional water and sewer system are now known. The bids were constructed to provide several different build out options. One option is to build the entire system. This would cost about $12.5 to $13 M and require town approval of an additional $3M. Within the Business District Development Committee there have been several related discussions including current and immediate future capacity needs and ongoing operational cost associated with a water and sewer treatment facility. The current choices are town employees or a private contractor.

Members of the committee have also identified and talked with three businesses that have plans to build/expand an additional 50,000 square feet of space if there is water. One of these business owners may go public at Tuesday’s meeting.

Yesterday morning at the monthly BDDC meeting we heard from a resident who proposed the town consider using a newer technology for waste water treatment. The claim is that newer type of treatment systems are less expensive to build, have the added advantage of increasing the system only need expands, and producing a more environmentally friendly end product.

By yesterday afternoon the Selectman were sent an email from the town manager with additional details on the newer technology. I have read the materials and have many questions. Does Bow own the land necessary to build such an alternative system? If so, is the land located in the area required by such a plant(s)? What is the continuing operational cost? All will be revealed on Tuesday night.

Town Manager Replacement

The interviews for a new town manager have been held in non-public session to protect the names of applicants who might not want their current employers knowing they are looking for a new job. As many of you know I have a strong commitment to the public’s right to know how their elected officials make decisions and in that way the public can make an informed decision about reelecting or not reelecting their representatives. Once the search has concluded I will ask the Board to vote to release all emails and any minutes to the public.

9-1-1 Committee

AKA/ the renumbering every house in town and the renaming of many streets committee

I anticipate the Select Board will decide on the make-up of the committee. I am proposing a representative from the PD dispatch service, the Fire Chief, a representative from the Heritage Commission and three town members. The issue was bogged down by different data bases for the town and state until I volunteered to help resolve the problem last January or February. By March the State was able to use synced data bases to develop their list of recommended changes for the Town of Bow. Their recommendations (note they do not provide any funding for their recommendations) include renumbering every house and business in town, changing many of the existing street names and taking houses currently on one street, creating a new street and placing these houses on the new street.

The committee will send out notifications to affected residents, hold hearings, develop suggested changes and report back to the Select Board. The Select Board will then decide on what if any changes are to be made.

State Recommends Bow Renumber Nearly Every Building

July 24th, 2010

Officials: Similar Names, Broken Roads Hamper Emergency Response

BOW, N.H. — The town of Bow may have to renumber nearly every home and business in town and rename nearly a dozen streets to improve safety.

Officials said making the changes should improve response time of emergency crews. In one case, officials said, a mail carrier overturned his Jeep, and it took 15 minutes to find the road he was calling from.

Read more at WMUR

Elections Violations – Bow Deserves Better

June 27th, 2010

Fellow citizens of Bow, upon hearing the final results in the election hall this past March, I immediately turned to congratulate and shake the hands of all winners, my opponents included.

Upon arriving home that evening, admittedly somewhat disappointed, I sat at my desk reviewing the final stages of the campaign, when my eyes fell to a packet of literature that an opposing group of running mates had stuffed in citizens’ newspaper tubes near their mailboxes including my own.

The packet was headed by a copy of an official Town of Bow ballot with opponents’ names already selected. There was no indication that this was a sample; in fact, the seal of the Town of Bow appears in one corner, and the signature of the Town Clerk, our senior election official appears in the other making it an official ballot. Nowhere on that ballot is there any indication that this was only a sample, nor is there the attribution statement required by state law. The individual palm cards, or informational fliers for each of those other candidates were also lacking the required attribution notations… you know, the familiar, but in this case lacking indication, “Paid for by Jill Smith candidate for Budget Committee Telephone 603- xxx-xxx.”

Putting aside the disappointment, I researched the State of NH election laws and found RSA 664:14 that specifically requires an attribution statement so that people know who is responsible for campaign advertising and have a clear way to follow up with any questions they might have for the advertisers and candidates.

At that point, I was deeply troubled by the principles involved. First, the misrepresentation of an official ballot with pre-selection of candidates seems to me to be at least cheating – if not fraud. Second, the willful violations of the state law for attribution statements demand that the violators be held accountable. My choices were to:

• let the feeling persist that the citizens of Bow, my running mates, and I had been cheated and set the precedent that Bow candidates for School Board, Select Board, Budget Committee are above the law…that was unacceptable.

• file an election law complaint and let the Justice Department seek a fair disposition.

The latter course was for me the better choice since it takes emotions out of the picture and focuses on the facts. If we hope to raise our children to be law abiding citizens we must set good examples.

- Jim Hoffman, Bow

Related: Article from Union Leader